Stargate Information Archive

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Search     Help     Rules     Members V     Calendar V     Live Chat V  

> Stargate SG-1: Science & Technology

This area is for general discussion of Stargate SG-1 only. SG-1 spoilers belong in the Spoilers & Speculation section. There is a separate category for Stargate Atlantis Discussion. Complete forum rules are available here.

SG-1 Index:  General Discussion | Spoilers & Speculation | Science & Technology | Nitpicking & Trivia | Stargate SG-1 Polls | Specific Episode Discussion

13 Pages V « < 11 12 13
", " " ) ); //]]>  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> If you could have one single thing..., Technology and Weapons only!
", img_item + " Switch to: Outline", img_item + " Standard", img_item + " Switch to: Linear+" ) );
JTMAG1
post Sep 28th 2007, 12:05 PM
Post #289


The Last Shogun
Group Icon

Group: Donating Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: August 28th 2004
From: Long Beach, CA USA
Member No.: 6,251
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Parmenides @ Sep 28th 2007, 10:59 AM) *

I don't see why you're being so petty - rather than countering Rogue's arguments, you're attacking the way in which he words them. Sure, euphemism was the wrong word to use (and it was mispelled ohmy.gif), but that's secondary to the actual argument he was making.

As for your criticism of the use of the word "ultimate" - it does have more than one meaning, you know. Such as "Of the greatest possible size or significance" or "Fundamental; elemental" - both of which are adequate to use to describe the "true" origin of Atlantis. Sure, it was weak to say Atlantis was "originally" from Earth when it was probably built somewhere else (its ultimate origin wink.gif) but it hardly causes Rogue's argument to fall down around him.

Okay, his arguments could have been worded more accurately - but I highly doubt you had extreme trouble understanding what he was trying to convey. I mean come on, even Revan let it slide! whistling.gif

(sorry Revan... 1.gif)

I pointed out the euphamism thing was that it appeared was trying to make himself sound smart, while misspelling the word and using it incorrectly. Then I pointed it out, he said, you can twist the meaning to fit however you like. If he is going to acknowledge that he is twisting meanings to fit his opinion there is no point in listening to the support of the opinion Then he did it a second time with the original ultimate, so I was through. I don't need to go to Wiki to learn about fallacies, I did it extremly well in college.

Words are important. If we are going to use English on this forum, then we need to use the standard English definitions of words.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lancelot
post Sep 28th 2007, 12:06 PM
Post #290


Chief Master Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Validating
Posts: 496
Joined: December 10th 2005
From: Ireland
Member No.: 10,650
Gender: Male



QUOTE(JTMAG1 @ Sep 28th 2007, 4:41 PM) *

Where's your evidence that 50% of British soldiers killed were shot by Americans? THat's a huge number and a terrible claim especially if you don't have any evidence. I would believe any country that had as many loses from another would consider that an act of war. If you are gonna make those types of claims, you better have some factual evidence to back yourself up. That's almost as silly as saying monkeys and apes rule the planet.

EDIT: Oh wait, you did say that dry.gif
I wouldn't know, becasue when I said, "...I'm done readings you're posts regarding this topic." I was done reading his posts in this topic. rolleyes.gif I never made it past the part that I quoted because it was the second time in this thread he insinuated that you can "stretch" the meaning of words to fit your meaning. You'll never have a meaningful discussion with anyone that believes that.

when I said half I didn't actually mean half, over here it's a figure of speach basically meaning that the yanks can't shoot for sh*t and when they do actually hit something it's quite often the people who are on their side,why do you think britain is pulling out of Iraq and Afganistan. rolleyes.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parmenides
post Sep 28th 2007, 12:25 PM
Post #291


Will pay for witty title.
Group Icon

Group: Donating Members
Posts: 1,151
Joined: October 22nd 2004
From: Glezgae, Shkotlan'
Member No.: 6,770
Gender: Male



Ugh, I don't want to get dragged into this...I just think you're being a bit overbearing. Instead of focusing on the arguments, you're criticising how they're worded - and because of a few (what is it, two?) questionable word choices, you're sweeping all of Rogue's points away as "tainted". That doesn't seem like very good logic - it seems like some perverse form of attacking the arguer, rather than the argument. Fair enough if you don't have the energy/desire to comb through every one of Rogue's arguments to make sure they are structurally and formally accurate (just to be sure!), but it's not really fair to dismiss them outright.

I'm not really so sure why this is being debated so fiercely.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JTMAG1
post Sep 28th 2007, 12:36 PM
Post #292


The Last Shogun
Group Icon

Group: Donating Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: August 28th 2004
From: Long Beach, CA USA
Member No.: 6,251
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Lancelot @ Sep 28th 2007, 12:06 PM) *

when I said half I didn't actually mean half, over here it's a figure of speach basically meaning that the yanks can't shoot for sh*t and when they do actually hit something it's quite often the people who are on their side,why do you think britain is pulling out of Iraq and Afganistan. rolleyes.gif

Let's not hijack the thread any further, but maybe it's because they (like the US) shouldn't really be there anyway.

QUOTE(Parmenides @ Sep 28th 2007, 12:25 PM) *

Ugh, I don't want to get dragged into this...I just think you're being a bit overbearing. Instead of focusing on the arguments, you're criticising how they're worded - and because of a few (what is it, two?) questionable word choices, you're sweeping all of Rogue's points away as "tainted". That doesn't seem like very good logic - it seems like some perverse form of attacking the arguer, rather than the argument. Fair enough if you don't have the energy/desire to comb through every one of Rogue's arguments to make sure they are structurally and formally accurate (just to be sure!), but it's not really fair to dismiss them outright.

I'm not really so sure why this is being debated so fiercely.

I stated my opinion, I used examples from the show to say why I feel the way I do.

EDIT: When you use poor reasoning, it should taint your whole argument.

EDIT2: If I could have one single thing right now, I would take time dilation technology. I would put a bubble around my office, stand right outside of it, let 8 hours go by, and then go in and log out.

This post has been edited by JTMAG1: Sep 28th 2007, 12:40 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Parmenides
post Sep 28th 2007, 12:54 PM
Post #293


Will pay for witty title.
Group Icon

Group: Donating Members
Posts: 1,151
Joined: October 22nd 2004
From: Glezgae, Shkotlan'
Member No.: 6,770
Gender: Male



QUOTE(JTMAG1 @ Sep 28th 2007, 6:36 PM) *

EDIT: When you use poor reasoning, it should taint your whole argument.

Poor choice of words shouldn't be equated with poor reasoning. Rogue already admitted that "metaphor" would be a better word than euphemism - if you put that word in, his argument still stands. His choice of "euphemism" was entirely unrelated to the actual content of his argument.

And now I'm stepping back. 1.gif Following on from JTMAG1...I suppose I'd take that nifty stealth device that Nirrti developed...or the Asgard equivalent from Shades of Grey.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revan
post Sep 28th 2007, 3:08 PM
Post #294


Dark Lord of The Sith
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,060
Joined: February 1st 2006
From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma
Member No.: 11,056
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Parmenides @ Sep 28th 2007, 11:59 AM) *

Okay, his arguments could have been worded more accurately - but I highly doubt you had extreme trouble understanding what he was trying to convey. I mean come on, even Revan let it slide! whistling.gif

(sorry Revan... 1.gif)

I don't know why anybody thinks words cannot be stretched to suit any given person's meaning... The nature of words and meanings and the relationship therein tends to allow a great amount of 'wiggle room'. smile.gif


Curses! To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JTMAG1
post Sep 28th 2007, 5:14 PM
Post #295


The Last Shogun
Group Icon

Group: Donating Members
Posts: 2,514
Joined: August 28th 2004
From: Long Beach, CA USA
Member No.: 6,251
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Sep 28th 2007, 3:08 PM) *

I don't know why anybody thinks words cannot be stretched to suit any given person's meaning... The nature of words and meanings and the relationship therein tends to allow a great amount of 'wiggle room'. smile.gif
Curses! To the last, I grapple with thee; From Hell's heart, I stab at thee; For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee!!

I think that in order to communicate in writing, we have to agree to use the same definitions of words. If the words you use don't mean what everyone else thinks they mean, you aren't speaking the same language.


I never read Moby Dick, I should probably get on that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revan
post Sep 28th 2007, 6:03 PM
Post #296


Dark Lord of The Sith
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,060
Joined: February 1st 2006
From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma
Member No.: 11,056
Gender: Male



QUOTE(JTMAG1 @ Sep 28th 2007, 6:14 PM) *

I think that in order to communicate in writing, we have to agree to use the same definitions of words. If the words you use don't mean what everyone else thinks they mean, you aren't speaking the same language.

I never read Moby Dick, I should probably get on that.

AKA: Dialects... That is a potential problem with an internationally visited website.

It isn't all that wonderful... like 13 or 16 chapters of it (in the middle) are insignificant menutia about whaling and sailing...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
StarGateZat
post Oct 17th 2007, 12:45 PM
Post #297


Senior Airman
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: June 29th 2004
From: United States of America, Tennessee
Member No.: 5,384
Gender: Male



Wow, reading this thread gave me a headache.

I think I'll go with the blue jello too; it would make me feel better.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revan
post Oct 17th 2007, 7:50 PM
Post #298


Dark Lord of The Sith
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,060
Joined: February 1st 2006
From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma
Member No.: 11,056
Gender: Male



QUOTE(StarGateZat @ Oct 17th 2007, 1:45 PM) *

Wow, reading this thread gave me a headache.

I think I'll go with the blue jello too; it would make me feel better.

You might need glasses. unsure.gif

Yeah but you can just go buy blue jello...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lancelot2
post Oct 18th 2007, 9:21 AM
Post #299


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: October 2nd 2007
Member No.: 15,443
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 18th 2007, 1:50 AM) *

You might need glasses. unsure.gif

Yeah but you can just go buy blue jello...

in a tube. you might get it on the internet try BLUETUBE biggrin.gif
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
StarGateZat
post Oct 18th 2007, 12:23 PM
Post #300


Senior Airman
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: June 29th 2004
From: United States of America, Tennessee
Member No.: 5,384
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 17th 2007, 7:50 PM) *

You might need glasses. unsure.gif


I just spent over $5000 on Lasik Eye Surgery. I don't think that's it 1.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revan
post Oct 18th 2007, 1:50 PM
Post #301


Dark Lord of The Sith
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,060
Joined: February 1st 2006
From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma
Member No.: 11,056
Gender: Male



QUOTE(StarGateZat @ Oct 18th 2007, 1:23 PM) *

I just spent over $5000 on Lasik Eye Surgery. I don't think that's it 1.gif

Unless they made a boo-boo...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lancelot2
post Oct 18th 2007, 2:52 PM
Post #302


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: October 2nd 2007
Member No.: 15,443
Gender: Male



QUOTE(StarGateZat @ Oct 18th 2007, 6:23 PM) *

I just spent over $5000 on Lasik Eye Surgery. I don't think that's it 1.gif

damn you'll go blind in a few yrs after that. cause what they don't say is that your eyes are constantly changing and laser surgery permantly changes your eyes into a certain way that won't change ever again.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
StarGateZat
post Oct 19th 2007, 10:01 AM
Post #303


Senior Airman
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: June 29th 2004
From: United States of America, Tennessee
Member No.: 5,384
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 18th 2007, 1:50 PM) *

Unless they made a boo-boo...


If they made a boo-boo. I'd know. When you make a boo-boo with a million dollar laser, it does pernament damage :-P


QUOTE(lancelot2 @ Oct 18th 2007, 2:52 PM) *

damn you'll go blind in a few yrs after that. cause what they don't say is that your eyes are constantly changing and laser surgery permantly changes your eyes into a certain way that won't change ever again.


They told me that actually. The part they cut still grows with the rest of your eye. I know the surgery isn't pernament. But I'm young and it benefits me much greatly than an older gentleman who's eyes degrade much faster than mine. Mine wore out from sitting too cloe to the TV when I was younger :-P So I have plenty of time to enjoy it. Plus, they said my eyes were thick enough to do the sugery again if my eyes get really bad again when I get old (I won't be doing that though).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Harlan
post Oct 20th 2007, 10:46 AM
Post #304


Airman Basic
*

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: September 11th 2007
From: Edinburgh, UK
Member No.: 15,172
Gender: Male



I think i'd have merlin's phase-shifting device then I could wander around undetected and hide stuff biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OdinisThor'sDad
post Oct 22nd 2007, 12:42 AM
Post #305


ASSgards are pussies!
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,104
Joined: January 29th 2003
From: Asan, South Korea (that's the good one)
Member No.: 490
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Lancelot @ Sep 29th 2007, 2:06 AM) *

when I said half I didn't actually mean half, over here it's a figure of speach basically meaning that the yanks can't shoot for sh*t and when they do actually hit something it's quite often the people who are on their side,why do you think britain is pulling out of Iraq and Afganistan. rolleyes.gif


Where are we agian? Oh ya, the Science and Tech forums. In science and math a half means 1/2, 0.500000 exactly one half.

Just like a billion means one billion (not just a big number). People shouldn't use numbers if the don't know how to use them. Please stick to integers between 0 and 100.

Easy enough.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lancelot2
post Oct 22nd 2007, 7:46 AM
Post #306


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: October 2nd 2007
Member No.: 15,443
Gender: Male



QUOTE(OdinisThor'sDad @ Oct 22nd 2007, 6:42 AM) *

Where are we agian? Oh ya, the Science and Tech forums. In science and math a half means 1/2, 0.500000 exactly one half.

Just like a billion means one billion (not just a big number). People shouldn't use numbers if the don't know how to use them. Please stick to integers between 0 and 100.

Easy enough.

don't be such a smart arse I already said it was a figure of speach not to be taken literally.
also merlins device would be cool all that time in the girls locker rooms and no one to know
(I'm a perv I know it so don't hate me).

This post has been edited by lancelot2: Oct 22nd 2007, 7:50 AM
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BigusDickus
post Oct 22nd 2007, 1:39 PM
Post #307


Airman Basic
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: April 17th 2007
Member No.: 13,661
Gender: Male



EDIT: Scrap that

This post has been edited by BigusDickus: Oct 22nd 2007, 1:43 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Revan
post Today, 02:08 AM
Post #308


Dark Lord of The Sith
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,060
Joined: February 1st 2006
From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma
Member No.: 11,056
Gender: Male



I have decided that I want Atlantis, or at least an Aurora class starship, even if its fugly.

Do those each count as "one single thing?"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KillerMarv
post Today, 02:46 AM
Post #309


Major General
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,825
Joined: April 7th 2006
From: Bucharest, Romania
Member No.: 11,622
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 27th 2007, 10:08 AM) *

I have decided that I want Atlantis, or at least an Aurora class starship, even if its fugly.

Do those each count as "one single thing?"


A valid point. It's like saying "I want Earth, or at least the Moon, even if it's lifeless." whistling.gif
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lancelot2
post Today, 08:02 AM
Post #310


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 92
Joined: October 2nd 2007
Member No.: 15,443
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Revan @ Oct 27th 2007, 8:08 AM) *

I have decided that I want Atlantis, or at least an Aurora class starship, even if its fugly.

Do those each count as "one single thing?"

yea but you'd still need the gene so where you going to get that from?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Science & Technology of Stargate SG-1 · Next Newest »
 

13 Pages V « < 11 12 13
", " " ) ); //]]>
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: October 27th 2007 - 9:15 AM
Stargate Information Archive

Stargate SG-1 © 1997-2007 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Stargate Atlantis © 2004-2007 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Text and images from this site may not be used without permission.

All comments on these pages belong to the author of those comments, and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Stargate Information Archive.